<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Decoding Cameron&#8217;s Radio Soundbites</title>
	<atom:link href="http://damnstraight.oversampled.net/2006/05/09/decoding-camerons-radio-soundbites/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://damnstraight.oversampled.net/2006/05/09/decoding-camerons-radio-soundbites/</link>
	<description>Culturally Queer News and Views from Abigail Garner</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 14:01:29 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Box Turtle Bulletin &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Paul Cameron Misrepresents Paul Cameron</title>
		<link>http://damnstraight.oversampled.net/2006/05/09/decoding-camerons-radio-soundbites/#comment-559</link>
		<dc:creator>Box Turtle Bulletin &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Paul Cameron Misrepresents Paul Cameron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 May 2006 23:06:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://damnstraight.oversampled.net/?p=218#comment-559</guid>
		<description>[...] Abigail Garner, the author of Families Like Mine, one of the three books Dr. Cameron bought from Amazon.com, caught his act on Air America and did an excellent fisking of that interview. And throughout that interview, the good names of the Journal of Biosocial Science and Cambridge University Press were repeated, loudly and clearly. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Abigail Garner, the author of Families Like Mine, one of the three books Dr. Cameron bought from Amazon.com, caught his act on Air America and did an excellent fisking of that interview. And throughout that interview, the good names of the Journal of Biosocial Science and Cambridge University Press were repeated, loudly and clearly. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kirsty</title>
		<link>http://damnstraight.oversampled.net/2006/05/09/decoding-camerons-radio-soundbites/#comment-552</link>
		<dc:creator>Kirsty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 May 2006 17:35:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://damnstraight.oversampled.net/?p=218#comment-552</guid>
		<description>I'm so glad that you're still persuing this fraudster - he needs to be drummed out of the scientific community, this sort of behaviour is just not acceptable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m so glad that you&#8217;re still persuing this fraudster - he needs to be drummed out of the scientific community, this sort of behaviour is just not acceptable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MattHillNC.com &#124; The Q-triad Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Anti-gay &#8220;researcher&#8221; Paul Cameron debunked again</title>
		<link>http://damnstraight.oversampled.net/2006/05/09/decoding-camerons-radio-soundbites/#comment-486</link>
		<dc:creator>MattHillNC.com &#124; The Q-triad Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Anti-gay &#8220;researcher&#8221; Paul Cameron debunked again</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 May 2006 03:57:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://damnstraight.oversampled.net/?p=218#comment-486</guid>
		<description>[...] Today, author Abigail Garner wrote a post on her blog concerning a radio interview Cameron did yesterday. Here is her post: Paul Cameron was a guest on the Thom Hartmann Radio Show yesterday. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Today, author Abigail Garner wrote a post on her blog concerning a radio interview Cameron did yesterday. Here is her post: Paul Cameron was a guest on the Thom Hartmann Radio Show yesterday. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat</title>
		<link>http://damnstraight.oversampled.net/2006/05/09/decoding-camerons-radio-soundbites/#comment-484</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2006 23:53:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://damnstraight.oversampled.net/?p=218#comment-484</guid>
		<description>What in the hell was Paul Cameron thinking when he messed with the very knowledgeable and straight woman Abigail????? Go get him baby. Sadly, along with the other (approx) 599 books I lost in Katrina, yours was too. It's will be years before I can replace them all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What in the hell was Paul Cameron thinking when he messed with the very knowledgeable and straight woman Abigail????? Go get him baby. Sadly, along with the other (approx) 599 books I lost in Katrina, yours was too. It&#8217;s will be years before I can replace them all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Abigail Garner</title>
		<link>http://damnstraight.oversampled.net/2006/05/09/decoding-camerons-radio-soundbites/#comment-479</link>
		<dc:creator>Abigail Garner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2006 16:35:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://damnstraight.oversampled.net/?p=218#comment-479</guid>
		<description>I sent a detailed email to the Associate Editor back in February, but did not receive a response.  (The editor did not have an email listed.) The post in which I included exactly what I sent the journal is &lt;a href="http://damnstraight.oversampled.net/2006/04/17/children-of-homosexuals-more-apt-to-disdain-cameron/"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I sent a detailed email to the Associate Editor back in February, but did not receive a response.  (The editor did not have an email listed.) The post in which I included exactly what I sent the journal is <a href="http://damnstraight.oversampled.net/2006/04/17/children-of-homosexuals-more-apt-to-disdain-cameron/">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hayden</title>
		<link>http://damnstraight.oversampled.net/2006/05/09/decoding-camerons-radio-soundbites/#comment-478</link>
		<dc:creator>Hayden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2006 16:33:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://damnstraight.oversampled.net/?p=218#comment-478</guid>
		<description>Abigail, I have just discovered your website and am so impressed.  I have heard about this Cameron "study" and have heard a lot of the arguments against his "research" but I had never heard about his three book source material and that you, author of one of the books, had refuted his claims.  How powerful!

I'm curious, and you may have addressed this question somewhere on your site (I haven't fully perused it yet), have you contacted Cambridge and informed them of these facts?  I am shocked that a scientific publication from an extremely highly regarded institution would have published such drivel.  I would think that, presented with the facts that you have laid out, they would consider rebutting or even rescinding the published report.

I understand that many have contacted the scientific journal and have gotten answers that research would be done and responses would be made, only to have never heard back from them.  It seems that they would be extremely embarrassed to have been swindled by this charlatan and might be too ashamed to print a retraction.

What are your thoughts on this and what has been your contact with and response from the journal publishers?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Abigail, I have just discovered your website and am so impressed.  I have heard about this Cameron &#8220;study&#8221; and have heard a lot of the arguments against his &#8220;research&#8221; but I had never heard about his three book source material and that you, author of one of the books, had refuted his claims.  How powerful!</p>
<p>I&#8217;m curious, and you may have addressed this question somewhere on your site (I haven&#8217;t fully perused it yet), have you contacted Cambridge and informed them of these facts?  I am shocked that a scientific publication from an extremely highly regarded institution would have published such drivel.  I would think that, presented with the facts that you have laid out, they would consider rebutting or even rescinding the published report.</p>
<p>I understand that many have contacted the scientific journal and have gotten answers that research would be done and responses would be made, only to have never heard back from them.  It seems that they would be extremely embarrassed to have been swindled by this charlatan and might be too ashamed to print a retraction.</p>
<p>What are your thoughts on this and what has been your contact with and response from the journal publishers?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
